top of page


The Formation of the Alliance of Sahel States: A Step Towards Pan-African Integration

The recent withdrawal of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the subsequent formation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) have sparked discussions about the implications for the African Union's (AU) vision of a Pan-African economic and monetary union. While some argue that this move may hinder the overall goal of integration in Africa, a closer examination reveals that it could be a win-win situation for the march towards economic and monetary integration.

The emergence of new leaders, such as General Assimi Goïta in Mali, Ibrahim Traoré in Burkina Faso, and General Abdourahamane Tiani in Niger, symbolises a departure from the status quo and a desire for greater autonomy and self-determination. The aspiration for regional economic and monetary integration lies at the heart of this transition. While ECOWAS has long been a proponent of regional cooperation, the AES represents a new paradigm that prioritises the interests and aspirations of its member states. This shift is particularly significant in light of the African Union's plans for a Pan-African economic and monetary union, including establishing an African Central Bank and introducing a single African currency by 2028. However, achieving monetary integration in West Africa poses unique challenges, especially given the member countries' diverse economic landscapes and historical legacies. With its vast oil reserves and complex financial structure, Nigeria starkly contrasts its Sahelian neighbours.

Moreover, informal ties to former colonial powers, particularly France, have hindered genuine economic sovereignty and integration efforts. West African states' unique economic characteristics have made it challenging to meet the Optimum Currency Area (OCA) requirements for monetary integration. The four requirements of the OCA theory, which the AU relies on as a framework for achieving monetary integration within the continent

, include labour mobility, capital mobility, price and wage flexibility, and fiscal transfers.

The three States' recent withdrawal from ECOWAS has sparked discussions about its implications for the AU’s vision of a Pan-African economic and monetary union. While some argue that this fragmentation may hinder the overall goal of integration in Africa, a closer examination through the lens of OCA theory reveals that it could accelerate the process and facilitate the achievement of the AU's objectives.

The breakaway of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger from ECOWAS could signal a step towards greater regionalism and autonomy, aligning with the AU's vision of a united and integrated Africa. By coming together under a standard banner, these countries can now focus on developing policies and strategies tailored to their specific needs and aspirations rather than being dictated by external forces. The AES union is to help these countries assert their agency and seek to forge closer ties based on shared cultural, linguistic, and geographical affinities. However, ECOWAS's reluctance to support the AES's bid for independence underscores the complexities and tensions inherent in regional integration efforts. Member states' divergent interests and priorities highlight the challenges of balancing national sovereignty with regional cooperation, particularly in a region as diverse and dynamic as West Africa.

The AES member states' shared cultural and linguistic heritage provides a strong foundation for enhanced labour mobility, a primary requirement of the OCA theory. This cultural affinity can facilitate the implementation of policies and initiatives that are more likely to be embraced by the populace as they resonate with their shared values and traditions. The long history of cultural and economic ties among the three countries can be leveraged to foster greater understanding and collaboration in pursuing common goals. As citizens of these countries share similar languages and cultural backgrounds, they are more likely to move freely across borders in search of employment opportunities. This increased labour mobility can contribute to a more efficient allocation of human capital and help mitigate the impact of asymmetric economic shocks. Also, forming the AES can lead to increased capital mobility within the alliance by harmonising financial regulations and creating a more integrated capital market, as the new AES union can encourage the flow of investments across member states. This can diversify risk, promote economic growth, and foster a more resilient and interconnected financial system.

The AES can also establish a system of fiscal transfers to support member states facing economic difficulties. By pooling resources and creating mechanisms for financial assistance, the alliance can help to stabilise economies and promote long-term growth. This can be particularly important in the context of external shocks or asymmetric economic developments within the AES. This third factor is necessary, as the similar economic structures and challenges faced by Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger suggest that they are likely to have more synchronised business cycles compared to the broader ECOWAS region. This alignment of economic conditions can facilitate the implementation of a standard monetary policy and reduce the risk of asymmetric shocks within the AES.

The formation of the AES also presents an opportunity for ECOWAS to streamline its integration efforts. With the departure of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, ECOWAS now has a smaller and more cohesive group of countries to work with, which can potentially accelerate the process of economic and monetary integration. The reduced number of member states means that ECOWAS can focus its resources and attention on countries more aligned with its vision and objectives, leading to more effective and efficient decision-making and implementation.

It is important to note that forming the AES does not necessarily imply a complete break from ECOWAS or a rejection of the AU's vision of Pan-African integration. Instead, the creation of the AES by Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger represents a significant step towards breaking free from the influence of former colonial powers and asserting their economic and political sovereignty at their own pace and in a manner that is more suited to their specific circumstances. This newfound independence can pave the way for a more integrated and harmonised economic system within the AES, which aligns with the AU's vision of regionalism. This fragmentation may contribute to a more organic and sustainable process of integration. As the AU continues to work towards its vision of a Pan-African economic and monetary union, the AES and its formation serve as a reminder that the path to integration may not always be linear but can be accelerated through strategic alliances and a focus on shared goals and values.

42 views1 comment

1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Apr 09
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.


bottom of page